You are hereFACE-OFF PART DEUX: LOSING FACE

FACE-OFF PART DEUX: LOSING FACE


congressBy Linda Kellen Biegel

In my previous article “Face Off,” I discussed that the Governor and her staff refused to reveal to Alaska Legislators what Alaska infrastructure projects the Governor’s office was submitting for inclusion in President-elect Obama’s Stimulus Package. I explained that rumors had persisted for a few weeks that the only projects she was submitting were road improvements and other infrastructure projects that benefited the gas line. (translation: benefited the Governor)

I also included an interview KTVA did with Senator Begich where he revealed this “confidential” letter between the Governor’s office and his administration and explained that Governor Palin was not asking for enough money.

http://www.gov.state.ak.us/pdf/ESLletter_Jan12-2009.pdf

Since then, the Governor sent out a press release in response that demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of this process, how it works and what her role is in it.

http://www.gov.state.ak.us/news.php?id=1601

She actually shows that she is completely befuddled regarding the entire stimulus process. She talks about her pet gas line projects as if they are earmarks…and wants them to be included in the package. However, later on in the letter and the press release, she keeps quoting various political figures on how “earmarks won’t be allowed.” Of course, she’s referring to those pesky other non-gas line related infrastructure projects, which are too…well…local to be considered (I left the typos in):

“It is my understanding that you have received funding requests from local goverrunents, non-profits, and other entities throughout Alaska. In large part, these requests reflect local concerns. It is not appropriate for the state to comment on each project that has come to our attention. Instead, we would prefer to focus on the rationale for our own recommendations to you.”

Then she commented further in the press release…to say she won’t be commenting:

“While others have compiled wish-lists of Alaska-specific projects, many of them meritorious, the governor says the administration will not be commenting on or ranking them, given that they might not be considered for the stimulus package. “We don’t want to get hopes up among community leaders that their local projects are likely to be included, when that probably won’t be the case,” she said.

Why is it not appropriate for the State of Alaska to comment on each State of Alaska project? Who has told Governor Palin these projects won’t be included? It certainly hasn’t been Senator Begich, whose office responded via Julie Hasquet, the Senator’s Press Secretary, when I sent them a copy of the press release (emphasis mine):

“The governor certainly has the right to not submit further projects for a possible stimulus package. But Sen. Begich will continue his process of gathering project lists and priorities from Alaska communities. With the great likelihood of a stimulus package being passed in the neighborhood of $800 billion, we certainly want Alaska poised and ready with its priorities.

Recognizing the climate on earmarks in Washington has changed, President-elect Obama has made it clear he wants to invest in infrastructure, projects and programs that will create jobs.

Whether the final bill contains earmarks or is formula-driven, Senator Begich wants to know what projects are ready to go in Alaska, so as money is available we can make sure Alaska projects are at the front of the line.

Along these same lines, I received an email from a respected source:

“I heard today from a DC contact that you were right-on about the Obama stimulus money and Palin's refusal to request our fair share. I was told that the state had about $325 million coming through the package but Palin only asked for $150 million.”

We have learned two, very important things from this information:

1: Congress hasn’t decided for sure how they are going to dole out the stimulus money. All they are doing is gathering information. They have a target dollar amount in mind for each state and all the Governors and State Delegations have to worry about is meeting/not exceeding that target. It’s going to take them awhile to figure it all out…they are dealing with multiple and normally separate pots of money. (Example—Corps of Engineers gets most of their money doled out one fiscal year at a time. FAA—most of their money is multi-year. And they come from completely different pots.) They still have to figure out how it’s all going to work.

2: It is NOT GOVERNOR PALIN’S JOB to figure out how the funding is going to work. What IS her job in this process is to gather all the information that she can, try to get the most, best infrastructure projects for her constituents by continuous dialogue with the Congressional Delegation, who will help deal with the rest of Congress, the President and all those tricky, Federal numbers.

As we can see from the dialogue that’s actually going on, Governor Palin is doing everything BUT her job and the Congressional Delegation is making sure that Alaska is not left (pardon the pun) out in the cold.

Yes, I remember from the last article…there are those who believe Governor Palin’s interpretation of President-elect Obama’s intent. So let’s look at some of the general suggestions for these “other projects.”

Among the project requests that mayors across the State have sent for inclusion to Gov. Palin and/or our Congressional Delegation are: harbor/port projects, road repair, hydro development, bridge repair, upgrades/replacement of city structures, upgrades/replacement of schools, internet upgrades/connection in Bush Alaska, etc…

According to a January 8th speech by President-elect Obama, here are just a few of the projects he considers appropriate for his stimulus package (emphasis mine):

“To build an economy that can lead this future, we will begin to rebuild America. Yes, we’ll put people to work repairing crumbling roads, bridges, and schools by eliminating the backlog of well-planned, worthy and needed infrastructure projects. But we’ll also do more to retrofit America for a global economy. That means updating the way we get our electricity by starting to build a new smart grid that will save us money, protect our power sources from blackout or attack, and deliver clean, alternative forms of energy to every corner of our nation. It means expanding broadband lines across America, so that a small business in a rural town can connect and compete with their counterparts anywhere in the world. And it means investing in the science, research, and technology that will lead to new medical breakthroughs, new discoveries, and entire new industries.

All of those projects are well within the boundaries of President-elect Obama’s intent for “rebuilding America”…most fit the definition perfectly.

So, I don’t understand why the Governor…someone who is supposed to be looking out for the well-being of Alaska and her citizens…has decided that she cannot comment on critical infrastructure projects vital to the economic heath and future growth of the state! Yet, she has no problem overstepping her bounds and resurrecting the “ghosts of Vice-Presidential campaigns past”:

“Although it is beyond my purview as Governor, I also urge you to consider how the economic stimulus package will affect the national debt and the future economic health of the country. The need for economic stimulus should not become an excuse for the continuation of the unsound policies of the past.”

Governor…how about you figure out how to deal with the “unsound policies” of Alaska’s present. Please provide what Rep. Mike Hawker has respectfully requested and turn in a budget to our Legislators based on realistic oil revenue, not pretty flowers flying out of a unicorn’s butt!

And how about you start to act like the Governor of Alaska by taking care of the needs of your present constituents, not catering to your “future voters” in the lower-48?

Linda Kellen Biegel is “Celtic Diva” the at Progressive/Liberal/Lefty blog “Blue Oasis”. http://divasblueoasis.com

 

We guarantee we provide the cheapest ghd, ghd Hair Straighteners,ghd straighteners, ghd hair tools in the market and 100% Quality Guarantee.

"...It means expanding broadband lines across America, so that a small business in a rural town can connect and compete with their counterparts anywhere in the world."

As you stated, it was your emphasis.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10142626-38.html

Obama aide: Full broadband plan not in stimulus 

 

"...WASHINGTON--Don't expect to find a comprehensive national broadband policy in the so-called economic stimulus package that President-elect Barack Obama hopes to sign in his first days in office, Blair Levin, a top technology adviser for Obama, said Wednesday."

 

...you are doing it again. 

 

The quote you took isn't mine, it's from Barack Obama's speech on January 8th so you'll have to take up the argument with him.  Feel free to listen to it in its entirety:

http://divasblueoasis.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=410

 

However, I'd make sure that I had ALL my ducks in a row before arguing directly with the President-elect.  For example, I'm sure that skipping the next couple of lines in that article you were quoting was just an oversight:

 

While funds for broadband deployment will be a part of the stimulus package, Blair cautioned groups interested in seeing more federal investment in broadband from expecting too much right away.

 

"Don't confuse a piece of the puzzle with the puzzle," Blair said at the Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee's State of the Net Conference here."

 

You do know that a lie of omission is still a lie, correct?

Linda, the ommision is from you in that Obama wanted how much in the Internet/ Broadband in this stimulus package? 40 Billion? I laid out the articles.

Your inference was that Obama was getting the broadband/internet package he wanted through Congress and it was Palin's fault for not asking for money. Obama doesn't even have a plan on how the 6 billion will be spent. But the devil in the details will start to surface. 

Here is what actually happened and will happen in the future. Congress passed 6 billion in grants or  "loans".  Will they be grants or loans, that is still an unkown.

http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Obama-Will-Spend-6-Billion-On-Broadband-100239?nocomment=1

"..About $6 billion of the $825 billion national infrastructure plan proposed by the incoming Obama administration is going to be spent on broadband, according to a brief synopsis of the stimulus plan be circulated today in Congress. That's considerably less than many consumer advocates had hoped for, groups like the Free Press pushing for a broad broadband package somewhere in the range of forty billion dollars. The plan being circulated is painfully vague about how this money is to be spent, saying only this:

Wireless and Broadband Grants: $6 billion for broadband and wireless services in under-served areas to strengthen the economy and provide business and job opportunities in every section of America with benefits to e-commerce, education, and healthcare. For every dollar invested in broadband the economy sees a ten-fold return on that investment."
 
Like I told you know one knows how the money is going to be spent in the pork bill, but the one caveat is it will have to "strengthen the economy and provide business opportunities".
 
How many bush communities do you think will fall under that definition when it comes to broadband and wireless? How much will it cost? Will rates be equal in the State of Alaska?  
 
The whole story is there to tell how Obama and Congress don't know how the money is going to be spent. 
 
Moreover here is some of the devil in the details.

http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/15/technology/mehta_broadband.fortune/

Stimulus package winners: broadband arms dealers

It wasn't the job of Palin to bring home the pork on this bogus funding on broadband. The lobbyists are out there doing quite frankly what lobbyists do.

Moreover, why is the government using taxpayer dollars to fund this instead of the private sector kicking out the dough. If it is going to make money then it will happen and survive. Otherwise if it doesn't then it becomes a money pit.

And getting back to your comment on Palin, if we don't know what communities will qualify, and we don't know if they will be loans or grants, how can one ask for something when Obama and Congress don't even know how it's going to be spent.

 

 

 

Palin does nothing if there is no benefit to her.  How is she supposed to position herself as "THE conservative" for a run for POTUS in 2012 if she is on record as feeding at the ecomonic stimulas trough?

There should be no doubt in anyone's mind that the most important thing to Sarah Palin is Sarah Palin.

Nothing she says or does surprises me anymore.  I expect her to like and deflect blame to others.  I suspect she will do so again now.

http://allalaskans.com/emperor/

the only one losing face is Obama and Begich. If you remember during the presidential election, Obama had this to say about Palin on earmarks.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/06/politics/main4422895.shtml?source=RSSattr=Politics_4422895

"...(AP) 

Barack Obama made his first direct criticism of Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin on Saturday, saying she pretends to oppose spending earmarks when she actually has embraced them."

Obama can play spin all he wants to on "infrastucture spending" but it still is an earmark.  

"...I know the governor of Alaska has been saying she's change, and that's great," Obama said. "She's a skillful politician. But, you know, when you've been taking all these earmarks when it's convenient, and then suddenly you're the champion anti-earmark person, that's not change. Come on! I mean, words mean something, you can't just make stuff up."
 

President -elect Obama should remember future quotes as this: "You can put lipstick on and try to dress up a pig of a spending spree, but it still is a pig and its name is earmarks."

You have to admire the Dems plan on spending almost a trillion dollars but they haven't figured out to spend it?  The only project that Begich has to worry about from Palin is money that goes to infrastucture on the gas pipeline. 

And while he is at it he can try to change the hearts and minds on tax deuctions for refineries. 

Tax Breaks for Oil Refiners
Title III, Subtitle C, Sections 328-329
Cost to Taxpayers: $119 million

This tax break begins with a reasonable premise: provide tax breaks to oil refineries to improve clean air standards. The problem is that the statue defines “small refiners” as those with refining capacity below 205,000 barrels/ per day—a high threshold that will include some large oil companies that have enjoyed huge profits. A better threshold would be restricting the tax break to those refiners with capacity below 100,000 barrels/ per day.

Following is the list of companies that appear to qualify for this tax break as it is now written: Chalmette Refining, TotalFinaElf, Crown Central-La Gloria Oil & Gas, Sinclair Oil-Little America Refining, Frontier Oil, Cenex Harvest States Corp, Murphy Oil, Farmland Industries, Ergon-Lion Oil, Giant Indus, Holly Corp-Navajo Refining-Montana Refining, Calumet, United Refining, Suncor Energy, Petro Star, Alon USA Energy, Gary Williams, Paramount Acquisition Corp, Placid Refining, Time Oil-U.S. Oil & Refining Co, Hunt, Transworld Oil USA, Apex Oil, Kern Oil, San Joaquin Refining, Countrymark Cooperative, Southland Oil, El Paso Corp-Coastal, Silver Eagle Refining, Wyoming Refining, Age Refining, American Refining Group, Greka Energy, World Oil, Cross Oil, Somerset Refinery, Young Refining, Foreland Refining, Oil Holding Inc, and Dow Chemical.

Section 328 would allow qualifying refiners to deduct 75% of the costs associated with complying with the EPA’s Highway Diesel Fuel Sulfur Control Requirements. Section 329 provides a 5¢/gallon of low sulfur diesel fuel produced by the refiner.

Halcro you paying attention? The reason why Petro Star is doing the upgrade is because they get a 75% deduction. Flint Hills can't on the refinery capacity. That's the difference.

Moreover, Conoco backed off on the refinery on the North Slope. Linda, tell your boy Begich it's time to put up or shut up. And do his job. Push federal legislation to allow a 75% tax deduction on refinery upgrades that are required by the dimwits at the EPA and Congress.

All refineries.

 

...want to take a stab at the actual article?

"...So, I don’t understand why the Governor…someone who is supposed to be looking out for the well-being of Alaska and her citizens…has decided that she cannot comment on critical infrastructure projects vital to the economic heath and future growth of the state! "

She has. It's called infrastructure for the gas pipeline. Two, as she has stated, it's also a national problem. Meaning the size of the earmarks bill is too large. And Palin has made her stance correctly and clearly on the matter.

There will be no manufacturing revolution following this bail out and it requires everyday people to spend their money, not save it.

We have now had a stimulus package pass in the form of tax money returned. That didn't help. We have bailed out the banks, that didn't help. We have given AIG more than what they (AIG) asked for, that didn't help. The list is growing.

This stimulus (earmarks) package will be short lived and when it comes time for Obama to ask for more in 2010, the economy will be in the tank. Because who will pay for the debt? China or Japan? They have their economic problems now.

Moreover, China will have to have everyday people in the U.S. buy their stuff. Ain't going to happen. People are in a saving mood.

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article8240.html The Last Nail in the Coffin for the U.S. Economy

Last, as I pointed out as an example, federal tax deductions on refineries can do more to stimulate growth on energy and keep energy costs down, then the government spending on so called Green energy programs. The devil is in the details on the bogus fly-by-night companies that are going to get in on this one and the dollars will be will be huge.

Let's see Begich walk the talk.

Various watchdog agencies are going to publish the pork in this so called stimulus bill and it will be pointed out that Barack didn't bring Change. Instead he will bring the same B.S. that has been going on for years. I can keep stabbing Linda, but your own bias is clearly getting in the way of seeing the big picture.

  

I for one agree with the Governor on this issue. A massive spending bill to "rebuild America" isn't something that has worked before. So far, Mr. Obama has only offered unspecified subsidies for "green jobs" and infrastructure spending. Politicians like infrastructure spending because it gives them something concrete to point to. But though Japan spent $516 billion on infrastructure in the 1990s, it didn't stimulate their economy, and that was during the technological boom that gave Clinton's term such positive economic growth. What makes Mr. Obama think it will work in America? The reason infrastructure is a poor stimulant is that there is a long lag time between project approval and when dollars actually get spent, even for projects on the drawing board. 

On the issue of school spending, the Muni already spends more than half of its budget on schools, and we are in no way putting out an "above average product" as Friedman put it. Not to mention Sen. Begich just ran a campaign on a "balanced budget" and we find out he left is with a $17mil shortfall?!What we do know is the millions are spent and wasted on school projects, and if they are not looking to be wasted, we will just hide them within other bills and get them passed under a different guise. What happened when South High didn't meet the three basic requirements for building a school near an existing neighborhood?  They hid it from the public and took care of one of the problems (lack of access due to non-existent road) by hiding it on the ballot as an Elmore Road improvement.  It was a $350,000 expenditure - which was passed by voters who probably didn't know any better- on top of a $60,000,000 expenditure for the school itself. Even Friedman said in 2002 that no amount of money will fix what happens. Now we are asked to give the schools more money to fix "pipes." South was just built and now they need improvements?!  

On the rest of the stimulus package, I am not sure why everyone is so keen on hoping the government can fix evevrything for us. We need to be smarter citizens and not look to the government to fix our problems. As Ronald Reagan famously said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.” When Reagan took office, he faced double digit inflation (19%) and double digit unemployment (12%). Do you think he answered the call with bigger government? There is a reason we call it Reaganomics. 

If we look at Mr.Obama's approach, we can see something like what FDR di with the new deal. In hindsight, we have realized that FDR's policies actually deepened and lengthened the recession, and we got lucky that a world war broke out to get us out. 

Governor Palin is doing what the Alaskan's want, when they voted massively against Barack Obama in the election. By a margin of almost 2 to 1. I think your rants and obsessive leg humping of the president-elect may be blinding you. Not everyone thinks the stimulus is a good idea. 

From the most recent Nobel Prize winner in Economics, Paul Krugman:  http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/opinion/10krugman.html?_r=1&hp

 

"...the truth is that the New Deal wasn’t as successful in the short run as it was in the long run. And the reason for F.D.R.’s limited short-run success, which almost undid his whole program, was the fact that his economic policies were too cautious.

About the New Deal’s long-run achievements: the institutions F.D.R. built have proved both durable and essential. Indeed, those institutions remain the bedrock of our nation’s economic stability. Imagine how much worse the financial crisis would be if the New Deal hadn’t insured most bank deposits. Imagine how insecure older Americans would feel right now if Republicans had managed to dismantle Social Security."

 

...and...

 

"Now, there’s a whole intellectual industry, mainly operating out of right-wing think tanks, devoted to propagating the idea that F.D.R. actually made the Depression worse. So it’s important to know that most of what you hear along those lines is based on deliberate misrepresentation of the facts. The New Deal brought real relief to most Americans."

 

According to Economist Brad de Long:  http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2008/11/lessons-from-th.html

 

"I have never been able to make any sense at all of the right-wing claim that the New Deal prolonged the Great Depression by creating a "crisis of confidence" that crippled private investment as American businessmen feared and hated "that Communist Roosevelt." The crisis of confidence was created by the stock market crash, the deflation, and the bank failures of 1929-1933. Private investment recovered in a very healthy fashion as Roosevelt's New Deal policies took effect."  (Delong has a really great chart as well.)

 

Also, read the letter from John Maynard Keynes (Open Letter to the U.S. President):  http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2008/nov/25/john-maynard-keynes-us-advice

 

"Broadly speaking, therefore, an increase of output cannot occur unless by the operation of one or other of three factors. Individuals must be induced to spend more out of their existing incomes; or the business world must be induced, either by increased confidence in the prospects or by a lower rate of interest, to create additional current incomes in the hands of their employees, which is what happens when either the working or the fixed capital of the country is being increased; or public authority must be called in aid to create additional current incomes through the expenditure of borrowed or printed money. In bad times the first factor cannot be expected to work on a sufficient scale. The second factor will come in as the second wave of attack on the slump after the tide has been turned by the expenditures of public authority. It is, therefore, only from the third factor that we can expect the initial major impulse."

 

The year that letter was written...1933...the President it was directed to was FDR.

http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bios/Keynes.html

John Maynard Keynes: The United States is ready to roll towards prosperity, if a good hard shove can be given in the next six months

Wow, a twofer; quoting both Krugman and Keynes in a single post. Impressive. 

I wouldn’t put a lot of stock into Krugman’s pontifications, as his Nobel is not worth a lot more than Jimmy Carter’s, Arafat’s or algore’s – something below that of low grade soiled toilet paper. If you want a good discussion of the idiotic democrat, socialist economic programs that extended and deepended the Great Depression, I would point you to to “The Forgotten Man’ by Amnity Shlaes. For basic economics, I would point you to anything by Milton Friedman, Hayek, Walter Wiliams or Thomas Sowell.
 
In our own lifetimes, and I am assuming you are older than 30, we have seen the way to climb out of a government-caused economic mess – that of the Carter years – and six years of huge democrat majorities in both houses of congress. Reagan implemented the suggestions of Friedman, Laffer and Hayek in 1981 and unwound that major economic disaster. It took a year and a half to unwind. What did he do? He unleashed the free market by controlling federal regulations; lowering taxes; controling government spending; and government intrusion into the marketpace. By 1983, the recovery was well underway. He didn’t demand a TARP. He didn’t demand a trilion dollars to pay off his supprters or the unions. This is how it is done. You hold the line on spending; roll back taxes and regulations; get the government out of the way and let the economy flush the bad money injected by poor government policies out of the system completely. The longer you spend time running down the Keyenisian bunny trail, the worse the economy gets.
 
One final point: Krugman’s quote goes after the elephant in the room, the ultimate Ponzi scheme – Social Security. It is going broke. And will be doing so under the current economic mess a lot sooner than it would under good economic times. Privatization of Social Security is the only way out, otherwise we are all going to see at a national level what Bernie Madoff managed to do to the Jewish charities in the Northeast.

But I will give you your due. You leftists, socialists and big government types are now in charge. And you will have a relatively unfettered two years to implement your “fixes.” Fortunately in the modern world, things move a lot faster than they did in the 1930s and public recognition of government failures and malfeasance will come a lot faster as information makes the rounds much quicker than it did back then. Once the worm turns, I expect it will turn very quickly and very harshly. I wouldn’t want to be on your side of the political and ideological fence when that bit flip takes place. 

i was going to come in and post something to that effect, but yours is well put.  

Diva

While I can not get with your hard left leaning ideology we do agree on the incompetance and self serving nature of Sarah Palin.

But please refrain from the reference to the Nobel Prize winners. This once proud group have taken themselve to the lowest form of political bias we have ever seen. Every single award in all categories comes with political bias and the folks I know from other countries agree the Nobel Prizes have become a joke and are barely covered by international press.

This is the wacky bunch that gave an award to ALGORE for his work on Global Warming-Climate Change-Global Warming-Climate Change-Global Warming-Climate Change-Global Warming-Climate Change. Gore has the be the greatest hypocrite of our time. History will see him as an elitist,  clownish pied piper who led a non-thinking mob to the brink of crashing the global economy before some adults entered the room and exposed the sham. Please don't be part of that non thinking mob.

Sorry for the ALGORE rant - just sort of got going on the dopey Nobel Prize.

Governor…how about you figure out how to deal with the “unsound policies” of Alaska’s present. Please provide what Rep. Mike Hawker has respectfully requested and turn in a budget to our Legislators based on realistic oil revenue, not pretty flowers flying out of a unicorn’s butt!