You are hereLeaked e-mails proves global warming the biggest, most expensive hoax in American history.
Leaked e-mails proves global warming the biggest, most expensive hoax in American history.
By Alex Gimarc
Alaska Standard Contributor
The leak of 160 meg of e-mails, computer modeling code, spreadsheets and other data from East Anglia University’s Climate Research Unit has exposed over a decade of fraudulent climate science “proving” the existence of manmade global warming. It has thoroughly documented the complete corruption of the peer review process and corruption of the scientific journals used to publish those results. At this point, not only are the conclusions that there is global warming now in question, but the data that led to those conclusions now suspect. And the corruption exposed engulfs the scientific community, the scientific journals, the UN IPCC, several universities, and even Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren, who has and still is participating.
What are the implications of this for us here in Alaska?
First of all, I would think that it is going to be a whole lot of fun in federal court fighting the listing of the polar bear as an endangered species and by extension, the use of that threatened status to lock up a quarter million square miles of Arctic Ocean as critical habitat. Now that this data, more importantly the e-mails that document willful obstruction of Freedom of Information Act requests for data and computer models here in the US and in Great Britain, is available, I expect an intelligent team of lawyers working for the state will be requesting some very interesting things in discovery. Imagine also the list of witnesses for the state, Michael Mann, author of the Hockey Stick, Phillip Jones, who said he was going to destroy data rather than turn it over to skeptics, John Holdren, who used his position to professionally destroy the profession reputations of a pair of solar physicists who had the temerity to publish a paper offering proof of the Medieval Warm Period when the Vikings colonized Greenland (back when Greenland was green enough to farm). I think the State of Alaska will win this lawsuit and predict drilling offshore.
Next could be the utilities in Alaska, who are busily planning on an energy generation future that does not use coal. The utilities have been working away from coal for years, mostly in response to expected federal legislation and / or EPA regulations on carbon dioxide emissions. The rationale for that legislation and regulation has just been blown up, which does not necessarily mean that this congress of the Obama administration will try it anyway. But the leak does arm us with the truth, for if there is no global warming, it can hardly be manmade. And if there is no manmade global warming, carbon dioxide, a natural part of the atmosphere vital for plant growth, is once again our friend. The state of Alaska has more coal than Saudi Arabia has oil. It needs to be considered as part of our overall energy and economic future.
Finally, we have a congressional delegation, particularly in the US Senate that has been supportive of the notion of global warming. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R, AK) has been working to modify federal legislation and rules on carbon dioxide emissions so that they will not significantly impact Alaska. But she has not actively fought the notion of manmade global warming. On the other hand, our Boy Senator, Mark Begich (D, AK) has surrounded himself with all manner of True Believer greens. Indeed, he was elected with their money and has been strongly pushing the green agenda. I wonder what he will do now that their entire reason for being has been shown to be the biggest, most expensive hoax in American history.
Make no mistake, the world of climate change has changed completely over the last ten days. Global warming does not exist. Indeed, one of the most damning e-mails released was written a decade ago and was discussing how to hide the decline in global temperatures. If global warming does not exist then manmade global warming does not exist either. And if neither exists, they can hardly be caused by manmade carbon dioxide emissions.
The real sadness of this entire episode is the corruption of the scientific method and the peer review process by $97 billion dollars of federal money. The sun has been very quiet for a few years, and lack of sunspots correlate quite nicely with times of global cooling. Look up the Maunder Minimum and the Dalton Minimum as examples. A colder than normal temperature will hit us here in Alaska earlier and harder than our countrymen in the Lower 48. But will anyone believe the Smart Boys the next time they cry wolf?
a number of cities recognized as Abercrombie and Fitch Women Sweaters global fashion centers or fashion Abercrombie and Fitch Women Outerwears capitals. Fashion Weeks are held in these Abercrombie and Fitch Women Hoodies cities where designers exhibit their new Abercrombie and Fitch Women Polos clothing collections to audiences. The main Abercrombie and Fitch Women Knit Layers five cities are Tokyo, London, Paris, Milan Abercrombie and Fitch Bags and New York - these five are renowned Abercrombie Fitch Bags for their major influence on global Abercrombie Bags fashion and are headquarters to the greatest Abercrombie and Fitch Caps fashion companies. There exist Abercrombie Fitch Caps a number of Abercrombie Caps cities recognized as Abercrombie and Fitch Hats global fashion centers Abercrombie Fitch Hats or fashion Abercrombie Hats capitals. Fashion Abercrombie and Fitch Scarves Weeks are Abercrombie Fitch Scarves held in these Abercrombie Scarves cities
Let's see all the e-mails, all the data, and all the funding sources for ALL sides of this debate. Where are you getting your information, Alex?? What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. The public would be better served if all the dirty laundry were put on the line.
Alex, for someone as edumacated as you I figured you would provide some "proof" or at least some damning evidence in the leaked emails that finally put to rest that global warming is a hoax. I was disappointed to see nothing of the sort. Corruption engulfing the scientific community, scientific journals and the IPCC?! "Complete corruption of the peer review process"?! All this due to leaked emails from East Anglia University? This sounds like a lot of hype to me.
As for the rest of your opinion piece, you are to be commended for your imagination and creativity. If I owned a power company that was hell-bent on building coal-fired plants for power generation, I would want you on my side.
One of the worst aspects of this is the suppresion of other views. The science community relies on grants from the National Science Foundation and other federal monies and if you are a scientists and want to eat, you had better not have views contradicting those of the alarmists.
Would love to see how the models are constructed to show that a modest increase in carbon dioxide will drive global temperatures up. I would bet that there are huge assumptions made that are not justified, especially when you consider that there has been no increase in temperature for the past ten years. Science is built by developing theories to explain observed conditions, the theories are then tested by predicting future conditons. If this paradigm is used, the global warming theories and models are wrong.
Don't expect much news about this in the Main Stream Media, who are hell bent on destroying American business with Cap and Trade and other legislation. If the current administration has its way, you will be driving a little tin can, or taking the bus, and your standard of living will fall like a rock.. But that's not important, you won't have a job anyway and will have a lot of time to collect moose nuggets to burn for fuel.